On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 14:05 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> @@ -498,7 +500,8 @@ struct sk_buff {
> * headers if needed
> */
> __u8 encapsulation:1;
> - /* 7/9 bit hole (depending on ndisc_nodetype presence) */
> + __u8 drop_unicast:1;
The obvious question is here, and for IPv4/IPv6 - should the wireless
stack be responsible for doing this instead?
The upside of this approach as-is is that all other protocols can easily
be extended to do this and no protocol-specific code is needed in
wireless; the downside is that it clobbers all protocol code. Thoughts?
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
