On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 17:06 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2013-10-14 at 16:58 +0200, Dennis H Jensen wrote: > > > > > The commit 59eb21a6504731fc16db4cf9463065dd61093e08 moved those channels > > > > to 4.9 GHz but left a hole in the 5.9 Ghz range. > > > > > > But there was no +/- 15 before, so what gives? > > > > Well no :) but there also wasn't a special case for that particular > > channel set (182 - 196). > > Yes, but then before 5910 would have been channel 182. Now you're making > it channel 197. That doesn't really make sense at all. OK, fair enough, but the fact is that there is a hole in the frequencies that were added in 802.11p. > > In case that doesn't do it. What is needed to get channel 182 to be 5910 > > MHz as Annex E defines for the US and Europe? Channel to frequency > > mapping based on operating class? > > Annex E is the 802.11 spec, to get something into that ... You misunderstood me; the European operating class 14, for example, states that channel 182 is to be 5910. Best regards, Dennis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
