> true. i was not aware that the beacon timestamp is taking PHY delays into > account and wrongly asumed that the RX timestamp should always be a bit > later. > (which is also what i saw on my atheros hardware: we usually get the RX > timestamp about 60 to 300 usec later than the beacon timestamp, but it's > quite likely that we have not calibrated everything 100% correctly.) Later actually surprises me, are you sure it's not earlier? If everything was calibrated perfectly it should be 192 usecs earlier (24*8 bytes at the most common 1mbit beacon rate). johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
