Search Linux Wireless

Re: guidance on struct alignment for rtl8192cu driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/16/2013 09:35 AM, Seth Forshee wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 09:08:34AM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
On 09/14/2013 12:36 AM, Jason Andrews wrote:
I'm using an ASUS USB N13 on an ARM platform with the rtl8192cu driver.
Linux kernel is 3.10 so I probably don't have the latest and greatest driver.

When I booted I got an ARM alignment trap caused by the driver.

I determined the cause was the 1st argument to spin_lock_irqsave() has an unaligned address.

By trial-and-error I found that if I edit wifi.h and insert 2 dummy bytes into the rtl_priv struct just above priv (last variable) the locks work and the driver works fine.

What is the recommended way to make sure the last variable in the rtl_priv struct (u8 priv[0]) is aligned on a 4 byte boundary so the driver works on ARM machines?

There are a lot of improvements for this driver in 3.11. The
backports release has that code. In addition, I am currently working
at improving the power management for 3.13.

The presence of unaligned variables that cause alignment traps on
ARM does not surprise me as I test only on x86 and ppc
architectures. I now own a Raspberry Pi and I will soon be testing
with it as well.

What does surprise me is that the first argument in all the calls to
spin_lock_irqsave() are contained within the rtl_locks struct and
everything there should be aligned. Perhaps some ARM expert will
know why aligning the last item in the rtl_priv struct fixes the
problem.

Depending on architecture version and configuration ARM may or may not
allow unaligned accesses. Even when allowed there is a cost though, so
it's better to properly align the data. In the past this would have
always meant 4-byte alignment, but my ARM experience is a bit dated now
and I don't know about 64-bit ARM. That variable-size array probably
only has byte alignment.

As far as I know, the proper way to do a 4-byte alignment is as in
the following patch:

Index: wireless-testing-save/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/wifi.h
===================================================================
--- wireless-testing-save.orig/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/wifi.h
+++ wireless-testing-save/drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/wifi.h
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ struct rtl_priv {
  	  that it points to the data allocated
  	  beyond  this structure like:
  	  rtl_pci_priv or rtl_usb_priv */
-	u8 priv[0];
+	u8 __aligned(4) priv[0];
  };

__attribute__((aligned)) might be a safer bet, as this will align it to
the largest alignment that could possibly be needed.

Seth,

Thanks for the help. So far, I have not heard if my original patch helps or not. When, and if, I hear, I will use your suggestion for the final patch.

Larry


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux