On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:58:57AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:29:46PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > When we get an interrupt from the hardware, the first thing the driver does > > is tell the device to mask off the interrupt line. Unfortunately this > > involves a SPI transaction in interrupt context. Some (most?) SPI > > controllers perform the transfer asynchronously and try to sleep. > > This is bad, and triggers a BUG(). > > Did this patch series get dropped? I saw that the followup series > of minor cleanups were merged into wireless-next, but not these. > > Since they didn't make it into 3.11, I intend to submit them to -stable, > but I need to make sure they at least make it into -next. I'll be sending them for 3.12 soon... -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
