On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:22:21PM +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:39:39PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> [Emmanuel is on vacation, I'll cover for him] > >> > >> On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:02 +0800, Greg KH wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 02:44:57PM +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > >> > > This small patch series enables 7260 and 3160 devices on 3.10 > >> > > kernel. Three patches are already in linux.git (3.11-rc1). > >> > > One patch is 3.10 specific and disables configuration that is not > >> > > supported in 3.10. > >> > > >> > I need the git commit id of these patches in Linus's tree before I can > >> > apply them. Please resend them with that information. > >> > >> The second and third patch does have it, and the first patch is only > >> relevant for 3.10 since 3.11 will have more device types enabled, we > >> just didn't get all the code in. This seems to be described in the > >> commit log, do you want more details? > > > > Yes, please resend them with those details. For me to take a patch that > > is not in Linus's tree is a big deal, I need a whole lot of > > justification for it. > > > > Just got back. Sorry for the delay. > I guess I will just drop that patch that is not in Linus's tree. > This patch disables a feature that is not likely to be used but we > *know* it is buggy. > So people who want more than just associating to their router will see > a bug in 3.10. > I guess we can leave with that since I was suggesting to disable the > feature anyway. Why would this patch not go to Linus's tree? If it's broken, fix it, and I can take the backported patch into the 3.10 tree. > So - do you want to resend, or you can apply the 2 patches I sent as is? Please resend. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
