On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 08:45 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Is anybody following this bugzilla? > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60690 > > it has a bisection in it, and a patch? It just came back to me and I commented on it - I think/hope that commits ddfe49b42d8ad4bfdf92d63d4a74f162660d878d (mac80211: continue using disabled channels while connected) 5cdaed1e878d723d56d04ae0be1738124acf9f46 (mac80211: ignore HT primary channel while connected) will have fixed this case as well as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981445 > The patch is a bit odd, but quite frankly, the current values for > IEEE80211_HT_PARAM_CHA_SEC_xxx are (a) odd and (b) used very oddly > too. Is it possible that that 0x03 really should be 0x02? The patch basically removes the code, the value really should be 0x3 as defined by the 802.11 spec table 8-130: Set to 1 (SCA) if the secondary channel is secondary channel relative to above the primary channel the primary channel. Set to 3 (SCB) if the secondary channel is below the primary channel Set to 0 (SCN) if no secondary channel is present The value 2 is reserved (it's a two-bit field) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
