On 08/11/2013 02:48 PM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi, On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:From: Piotr Haber <phaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Add support for 4313 iPA variant. It is a variant of already supported 4313 ePA, so this patch adds the required PHY changes to support it properly including an updated switch control table for BT-combo card variants.Okay, I'll bite. Since this patch was already reverted once, it warrants some additional scrutiny.
That's the right attitude ;-) The revert made us cautious as well before sending out this patch, but thanks for making the effort.
First of all, the patch is quite large, and I wonder if it couldn't be split into smaller patches, especially as it looks like there are additional fixes/changes merged in it.
It indeed seems rather large. The original work from Piotr were two patches that I squashed. I will break up this patch in more individual patches.
John, Can you drop this patch from the series?
Detailed comments below ...Tested-by: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: David Costa <david@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Piotr Haber <phaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---This is obviously a V2 (or V(n+1) where n was the reverted version), so there should be something describing the changes to the reverted version. Why should we trust it now to not break things again? (Yes, I see those Tested-bys ;-)
This is a gray area. The original patch was taken into the tree so I considered this to be a new patch.
We tested with a number of 4313 variants having some extra shipped that we did not have at the time of the original patch. I looked up the revert patch and noticed it is tagged with Reported-by. So I will ask David Herrmann to test V(n+2) before sending it (if you don't mind n will be 0).
.../net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c | 399 +++++++++++++-------- .../wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.c | 289 +++++++++------ .../wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 436 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c index 3d6b16c..b8ddaad 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phy_lcn.c @@ -1137,8 +1137,9 @@ wlc_lcnphy_set_rx_gain_by_distribution(struct brcms_phy *pi, gain0_15 = ((biq1 & 0xf) << 12) | ((tia & 0xf) << 8) | ((lna2 & 0x3) << 6) | - ((lna2 & - 0x3) << 4) | ((lna1 & 0x3) << 2) | ((lna1 & 0x3) << 0); + ((lna2 & 0x3) << 4) | + ((lna1 & 0x3) << 2) | + ((lna1 & 0x3) << 0);Unrelated style change.
I will put this in a separate patch.
mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b6, (0xffff << 0), gain0_15 << 0); mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b7, (0xf << 0), gain16_19 << 0); @@ -1328,6 +1329,43 @@ static u32 wlc_lcnphy_measure_digital_power(struct brcms_phy *pi, u16 nsamples) return (iq_est.i_pwr + iq_est.q_pwr) / nsamples; } +static bool wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal_gain(struct brcms_phy *pi, u16 biq1_gain, + u16 tia_gain, u16 lna2_gain) +{ + u32 i_thresh_l, q_thresh_l; + u32 i_thresh_h, q_thresh_h; + struct lcnphy_iq_est iq_est_h, iq_est_l; + + wlc_lcnphy_set_rx_gain_by_distribution(pi, 0, 0, 0, biq1_gain, tia_gain, + lna2_gain, 0); + + wlc_lcnphy_rx_gain_override_enable(pi, true); + wlc_lcnphy_start_tx_tone(pi, 2000, (40 >> 1), 0); + udelay(500); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG112, 0); + if (!wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_est(pi, 1024, 32, &iq_est_l)) + return false; + + wlc_lcnphy_start_tx_tone(pi, 2000, 40, 0); + udelay(500); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG112, 0); + if (!wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_est(pi, 1024, 32, &iq_est_h)) + return false; + + i_thresh_l = (iq_est_l.i_pwr << 1); + i_thresh_h = (iq_est_l.i_pwr << 2) + iq_est_l.i_pwr; + + q_thresh_l = (iq_est_l.q_pwr << 1); + q_thresh_h = (iq_est_l.q_pwr << 2) + iq_est_l.q_pwr;So X_thresh_l == iq_est_l.X_pwr * 2 and X_thresh_h == iq_est_l.X_pwr * 5? Why not trust the compiler to use optimize it? It would be a bit more readable.
This is a bit personal. A C programmer is probably as familiar with bitwise operators as with arithmetic. Anyways, my main reason for having it this way is maintainability as it closely resembles the internal driver code base. So I tend to leave it as is.
+ if ((iq_est_h.i_pwr > i_thresh_l) && + (iq_est_h.i_pwr < i_thresh_h) && + (iq_est_h.q_pwr > q_thresh_l) && + (iq_est_h.q_pwr < q_thresh_h)) + return true; + + return false; +} + static bool wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal(struct brcms_phy *pi, const struct lcnphy_rx_iqcomp *iqcomp, @@ -1342,8 +1380,8 @@ wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal(struct brcms_phy *pi, RFOverrideVal0_old, rfoverride2_old, rfoverride2val_old, rfoverride3_old, rfoverride3val_old, rfoverride4_old, rfoverride4val_old, afectrlovr_old, afectrlovrval_old; - int tia_gain; - u32 received_power, rx_pwr_threshold; + int tia_gain, lna2_gain, biq1_gain; + bool set_gain; u16 old_sslpnCalibClkEnCtrl, old_sslpnRxFeClkEnCtrl; u16 values_to_save[11]; s16 *ptr; @@ -1368,126 +1406,134 @@ wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal(struct brcms_phy *pi, goto cal_done; } - if (module == 1) { + WARN_ON(module != 1); + tx_pwr_ctrl = wlc_lcnphy_get_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi); + wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi, LCNPHY_TX_PWR_CTRL_OFF); - tx_pwr_ctrl = wlc_lcnphy_get_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi); - wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi, LCNPHY_TX_PWR_CTRL_OFF);This indentation change makes it a bit harder to review, but luckily there is git show -b ...
I will do the indentation change with a separate patch.
+ for (i = 0; i < 11; i++) + values_to_save[i] = + read_radio_reg(pi, rxiq_cal_rf_reg[i]); + Core1TxControl_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x631); + + or_phy_reg(pi, 0x631, 0x0015); + + RFOverride0_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c); + RFOverrideVal0_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x44d); + rfoverride2_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b0); + rfoverride2val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b1); + rfoverride3_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9); + rfoverride3val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa); + rfoverride4_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x938); + rfoverride4val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x939); + afectrlovr_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b); + afectrlovrval_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c); + old_sslpnCalibClkEnCtrl = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da); + old_sslpnRxFeClkEnCtrl = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db); - for (i = 0; i < 11; i++) - values_to_save[i] = - read_radio_reg(pi, rxiq_cal_rf_reg[i]); - Core1TxControl_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x631); - - or_phy_reg(pi, 0x631, 0x0015); - - RFOverride0_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c); - RFOverrideVal0_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x44d); - rfoverride2_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b0); - rfoverride2val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b1); - rfoverride3_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9); - rfoverride3val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa); - rfoverride4_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x938); - rfoverride4val_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x939); - afectrlovr_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b); - afectrlovrval_old = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c); - old_sslpnCalibClkEnCtrl = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da); - old_sslpnRxFeClkEnCtrl = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db); - - tx_gain_override_old = wlc_lcnphy_tx_gain_override_enabled(pi); - if (tx_gain_override_old) { - wlc_lcnphy_get_tx_gain(pi, &old_gains); - tx_gain_index_old = pi_lcn->lcnphy_current_index; - } + tx_gain_override_old = wlc_lcnphy_tx_gain_override_enabled(pi); + if (tx_gain_override_old) { + wlc_lcnphy_get_tx_gain(pi, &old_gains); + tx_gain_index_old = pi_lcn->lcnphy_current_index; + } - wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, tx_gain_idx); + wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, tx_gain_idx); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, (0x1 << 1), 0 << 1); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, (0x1 << 1), 0 << 1); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG116, 0x06); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG12C, 0x07); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG06A, 0xd3); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG098, 0x03); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG00B, 0x7); - mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG113, 1 << 4, 1 << 4); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG01D, 0x01); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG114, 0x01); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG02E, 0x10); - write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG12A, 0x08); - - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 2), 1 << 2); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 2), 1 << 2); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 3), 1 << 3); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 3), 1 << 3); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 5), 1 << 5); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 5), 0 << 5); - - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); - - wlc_lcnphy_start_tx_tone(pi, 2000, 120, 0); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da, 0xffff); - or_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db, 0x3); - wlc_lcnphy_set_trsw_override(pi, tx_switch, rx_switch); - wlc_lcnphy_rx_gain_override_enable(pi, true); - - tia_gain = 8; - rx_pwr_threshold = 950; - while (tia_gain > 0) { - tia_gain -= 1; - wlc_lcnphy_set_rx_gain_by_distribution(pi, - 0, 0, 2, 2, - (u16) - tia_gain, 1, 0); - udelay(500); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG116, 0x06); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG12C, 0x07); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG06A, 0xd3); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG098, 0x03); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG00B, 0x7); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG113, 1 << 4, 1 << 4); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG01D, 0x01); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG114, 0x01); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG02E, 0x10); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG12A, 0x08); + + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 1), 1 << 1); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 2), 1 << 2); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 2), 1 << 2); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 3), 1 << 3); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 3), 1 << 3); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, (0x1 << 5), 1 << 5); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, (0x1 << 5), 0 << 5); - received_power = - wlc_lcnphy_measure_digital_power(pi, 2000); - if (received_power < rx_pwr_threshold) - break; + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, (0x1 << 0), 1 << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, (0x1 << 0), 0 << 0); + + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da, 0xffff); + or_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db, 0x3); + + wlc_lcnphy_set_trsw_override(pi, tx_switch, rx_switch); + set_gain = false; + + lna2_gain = 3; + while ((lna2_gain >= 0) && !set_gain) { + tia_gain = 4; + + while ((tia_gain >= 0) && !set_gain) { + biq1_gain = 6; + + while ((biq1_gain >= 0) && !set_gain) { + set_gain = wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal_gain(pi, + (u16) + biq1_gain, + (u16) + tia_gain, + (u16) + lna2_gain); + biq1_gain -= 1; + } + tia_gain -= 1; } - result = wlc_lcnphy_calc_rx_iq_comp(pi, 0xffff); + lna2_gain -= 1; + }This looks like it could be made more readable using for loops and a goto: for (lna_gain = 3; lna_gain >= 0; lna_gain--) { for (tia_gain = 4; tia_gain >= 0; tia_gain--) { for (big1_gain = 6; big1_gain >= 0; big1_gain--) { set_gain = wlc_lcnphy_rx_iq_cal_gain(...); if (set_gain) goto found; } } } found: ...
That is a sensible change. Will do.
- wlc_lcnphy_stop_tx_tone(pi); + if (set_gain) + result = wlc_lcnphy_calc_rx_iq_comp(pi, 1024); + else + result = false; - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x631, Core1TxControl_old); + wlc_lcnphy_stop_tx_tone(pi); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c, RFOverrideVal0_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x44d, RFOverrideVal0_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b0, rfoverride2_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b1, rfoverride2val_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9, rfoverride3_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa, rfoverride3val_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, rfoverride4_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, rfoverride4val_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, afectrlovr_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, afectrlovrval_old); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da, old_sslpnCalibClkEnCtrl); - write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db, old_sslpnRxFeClkEnCtrl); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x631, Core1TxControl_old); + + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c, RFOverrideVal0_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x44d, RFOverrideVal0_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b0, rfoverride2_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4b1, rfoverride2val_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4f9, rfoverride3_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4fa, rfoverride3val_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x938, rfoverride4_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x939, rfoverride4val_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x43b, afectrlovr_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x43c, afectrlovrval_old); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6da, old_sslpnCalibClkEnCtrl); + write_phy_reg(pi, 0x6db, old_sslpnRxFeClkEnCtrl); - wlc_lcnphy_clear_trsw_override(pi); + wlc_lcnphy_clear_trsw_override(pi); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c, (0x1 << 2), 0 << 2); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c, (0x1 << 2), 0 << 2); - for (i = 0; i < 11; i++) - write_radio_reg(pi, rxiq_cal_rf_reg[i], - values_to_save[i]); + for (i = 0; i < 11; i++) + write_radio_reg(pi, rxiq_cal_rf_reg[i], + values_to_save[i]); - if (tx_gain_override_old) - wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, tx_gain_index_old); - else - wlc_lcnphy_disable_tx_gain_override(pi); + if (tx_gain_override_old) + wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, tx_gain_index_old); + else + wlc_lcnphy_disable_tx_gain_override(pi); - wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi, tx_pwr_ctrl); - wlc_lcnphy_rx_gain_override_enable(pi, false); - } + wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi, tx_pwr_ctrl); + wlc_lcnphy_rx_gain_override_enable(pi, false); cal_done: kfree(ptr); @@ -1789,6 +1835,17 @@ wlc_lcnphy_radio_2064_channel_tune_4313(struct brcms_phy *pi, u8 channel) write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG038, 3); write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG091, 7); } + + if (!(pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM)) { + u8 reg038[14] = {0xd, 0xe, 0xd, 0xd, 0xd, 0xc, + 0xa, 0xb, 0xb, 0x3, 0x3, 0x2, 0x0, 0x0}; + + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG02A, 0xf); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG091, 0x3); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG038, 0x3); + + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG038, reg038[channel - 1]); + } } static int @@ -1983,6 +2040,16 @@ wlc_lcnphy_set_tssi_mux(struct brcms_phy *pi, enum lcnphy_tssi_mode pos) } else { mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG03A, 1, 0x1); mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11A, 0x8, 0x8); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG028, 0x1, 0x0); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11A, 0x4, 1<<2); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG036, 0x10, 0x0); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11A, 0x10, 1<<4); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG036, 0x3, 0x0); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG035, 0xff, 0x77); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG028, 0x1e, 0xe<<1); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG112, 0x80, 1<<7); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG005, 0x7, 1<<1); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG029, 0xf0, 0<<4);What does this do? This seems to be applied regardless of iPA or ePA, so I looks like it fixes something? Or is this needed for iPA and harmless for ePA?
When reviewing this patch that was one of my comments as well. It was added because the iPA changes were ported from a more recent branch of our internal driver.
What changed is the TSSI algorithm for both ePA and iPA. I will try to create a separate patch for that for ePA. Most of the comments below are related to this.
} } else { mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d9, (0x1 << 2), (0x1) << 2); @@ -2069,12 +2136,14 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_pwrctrl_rssiparams(struct brcms_phy *pi) (auxpga_vmid_temp << 0) | (auxpga_gain_temp << 12)); mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG082, (1 << 5), (1 << 5)); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG07C, (1 << 0), (1 << 0));Same here.} static void wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(struct brcms_phy *pi) { struct phytbl_info tab; u32 rfseq, ind; + u8 tssi_sel; tab.tbl_id = LCNPHY_TBL_ID_TXPWRCTL; tab.tbl_width = 32; @@ -2096,7 +2165,13 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(struct brcms_phy *pi) mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x503, (0x1 << 4), (1) << 4); - wlc_lcnphy_set_tssi_mux(pi, LCNPHY_TSSI_EXT); + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) { + tssi_sel = 0x1; + wlc_lcnphy_set_tssi_mux(pi, LCNPHY_TSSI_EXT); + } else { + tssi_sel = 0xe; + wlc_lcnphy_set_tssi_mux(pi, LCNPHY_TSSI_POST_PA); + }Doesn't this change change tssi_sel from 0xe to 0x1 for (already supported) ePA cards, and sets it to the old value 0xe for iPA ones? I would have expected 0xe for BFL_FEM /ePA and 0x1 for iPA ... .mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4a4, (0x1 << 14), (0) << 14); mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4a4, (0x1 << 15), (1) << 15); @@ -2132,9 +2207,10 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(struct brcms_phy *pi) mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x49a, (0x1ff << 0), (0xff) << 0); if (LCNREV_IS(pi->pubpi.phy_rev, 2)) { - mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG028, 0xf, 0xe); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG028, 0xf, tssi_sel); mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG086, 0x4, 0x4); } else { + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG028, 0x1e, tssi_sel << 1);Okay, this one is new also for the ePA case, so I wonder why this wasn't needed before?mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG03A, 0x1, 1); mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11A, 0x8, 1 << 3); } @@ -2181,6 +2257,10 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(struct brcms_phy *pi) mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d7, (0xf << 8), (0) << 8); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG035, 0xff, 0x0); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG036, 0x3, 0x0); + mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11A, 0x8, 0x8); +Same for these three writes.wlc_lcnphy_pwrctrl_rssiparams(pi); } @@ -2799,6 +2879,8 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_idle_tssi_est(struct brcms_phy_pub *ppi) read_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG007) & 1; u16 SAVE_jtag_auxpga = read_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG0FF) & 0x10; u16 SAVE_iqadc_aux_en = read_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11F) & 4; + u8 SAVE_bbmult = wlc_lcnphy_get_bbmult(pi); +These changes also look at a first glance unrelated to iPA, as well as ...idleTssi = read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4ab); suspend = (0 == (bcma_read32(pi->d11core, D11REGOFFS(maccontrol)) & MCTL_EN_MAC)); @@ -2816,6 +2898,12 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_idle_tssi_est(struct brcms_phy_pub *ppi) mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG0FF, 0x10, 1 << 4); mod_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG11F, 0x4, 1 << 2); wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(pi); + + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d7, (0x1 << 0), (1 << 0)); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d7, (0x1 << 6), (1 << 6)); + + wlc_lcnphy_set_bbmult(pi, 0x0); +These ones.wlc_phy_do_dummy_tx(pi, true, OFF); idleTssi = ((read_phy_reg(pi, 0x4ab) & (0x1ff << 0)) >> 0); @@ -2837,6 +2925,7 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_idle_tssi_est(struct brcms_phy_pub *ppi) mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x44c, (0x1 << 12), (0) << 12); + wlc_lcnphy_set_bbmult(pi, SAVE_bbmult); wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_gain_override(pi, tx_gain_override_old); wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_gain(pi, &old_gains); wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_ctrl(pi, SAVE_txpwrctrl); @@ -3050,6 +3139,11 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tx_pwr_ctrl_init(struct brcms_phy_pub *ppi) wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); tab.tbl_offset++; } + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d0, (0x1 << 0), (0) << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d3, (0xff << 0), (0) << 0); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d3, (0xff << 8), (0) << 8); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d0, (0x1 << 4), (0) << 4); + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4d0, (0x1 << 2), (0) << 2); mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x410, (0x1 << 7), (0) << 7); @@ -3851,7 +3945,6 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_txpwrtbl_iqlo_cal(struct brcms_phy *pi) target_gains.pad_gain = 21; target_gains.dac_gain = 0; wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_gain(pi, &target_gains); - wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, 16); if (LCNREV_IS(pi->pubpi.phy_rev, 1) || pi_lcn->lcnphy_hw_iqcal_en) { @@ -3862,6 +3955,7 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_txpwrtbl_iqlo_cal(struct brcms_phy *pi) lcnphy_recal ? LCNPHY_CAL_RECAL : LCNPHY_CAL_FULL), false); } else { + wlc_lcnphy_set_tx_pwr_by_index(pi, 16); wlc_lcnphy_tx_iqlo_soft_cal_full(pi); } @@ -4286,17 +4380,22 @@ wlc_lcnphy_load_tx_gain_table(struct brcms_phy *pi, if (CHSPEC_IS5G(pi->radio_chanspec)) pa_gain = 0x70; else - pa_gain = 0x70; + pa_gain = 0x60;You are reducing the value for !BFL_FEM, I assume this is a fix for something?
Your guess is as good as mine. Internally, we get phy code deliveries from system engineering team and unfortunately the changelog is pretty high-level.
if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) pa_gain = 0x10; +Unnecessary whitespace change.
Probably, Whitespace jEdit plugin did that for me. Sorry about that.
tab.tbl_id = LCNPHY_TBL_ID_TXPWRCTL; tab.tbl_width = 32; tab.tbl_len = 1; tab.tbl_ptr = &val; for (j = 0; j < 128; j++) { - gm_gain = gain_table[j].gm; + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) + gm_gain = gain_table[j].gm; + else + gm_gain = 15; + val = (((u32) pa_gain << 24) | (gain_table[j].pad << 16) | (gain_table[j].pga << 8) | gm_gain); @@ -4507,7 +4606,10 @@ static void wlc_radio_2064_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) write_phy_reg(pi, 0x4ea, 0x4688); - mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4eb, (0x7 << 0), 2 << 0); + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4eb, (0x7 << 0), 2 << 0); + else + mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4eb, (0x7 << 0), 3 << 0); mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4eb, (0x7 << 6), 0 << 6); @@ -4518,6 +4620,13 @@ static void wlc_radio_2064_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) wlc_lcnphy_rcal(pi); wlc_lcnphy_rc_cal(pi); + + if (!(pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM)) { + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG032, 0x6f); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG033, 0x19); + write_radio_reg(pi, RADIO_2064_REG039, 0xe); + } + } static void wlc_lcnphy_radio_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) @@ -4530,6 +4639,7 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tbl_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) uint idx; u8 phybw40; struct phytbl_info tab; + const struct phytbl_info *tb; u32 val; phybw40 = CHSPEC_IS40(pi->radio_chanspec); @@ -4547,22 +4657,20 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tbl_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); } - tab.tbl_id = LCNPHY_TBL_ID_RFSEQ; - tab.tbl_width = 16; - tab.tbl_ptr = &val; - tab.tbl_len = 1; - - val = 114; - tab.tbl_offset = 0; - wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); + if (!(pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM)) { + tab.tbl_id = LCNPHY_TBL_ID_RFSEQ; + tab.tbl_width = 16; + tab.tbl_ptr = &val; + tab.tbl_len = 1; - val = 130; - tab.tbl_offset = 1; - wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); + val = 150; + tab.tbl_offset = 0; + wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); - val = 6; - tab.tbl_offset = 8; - wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); + val = 220; + tab.tbl_offset = 1; + wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tab); + }So this isn't needed anymore for ePA cards?
Suspicious. I will look into this one.
if (CHSPEC_IS2G(pi->radio_chanspec)) { if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) @@ -4576,7 +4684,6 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tbl_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) } if (LCNREV_IS(pi->pubpi.phy_rev, 2)) { - const struct phytbl_info *tb; int l; if (CHSPEC_IS2G(pi->radio_chanspec)) { @@ -4597,21 +4704,22 @@ static void wlc_lcnphy_tbl_init(struct brcms_phy *pi) wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &tb[idx]); } - if ((pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) - && !(pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM_BT)) - wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_epa); - else if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM_BT) { - if (pi->sh->boardrev < 0x1250) - wlc_lcnphy_write_table( - pi, - &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_epa); + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) { + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM_BT) { + if (pi->sh->boardrev < 0x1250) + tb = &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_epa; + else + tb = &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_epa_p250; + } else { + tb = &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_epa; + } + } else { + if (pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM_BT) + tb = &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_ipa; else - wlc_lcnphy_write_table( - pi, - &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_epa_p250); - } else - wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313); - + tb = &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313; + } + wlc_lcnphy_write_table(pi, tb); wlc_lcnphy_load_rfpower(pi); wlc_lcnphy_clear_papd_comptable(pi); @@ -4955,6 +5063,8 @@ void wlc_phy_chanspec_set_lcnphy(struct brcms_phy *pi, u16 chanspec) wlc_lcnphy_load_tx_iir_filter(pi, true, 3); mod_phy_reg(pi, 0x4eb, (0x7 << 3), (1) << 3); + if (wlc_lcnphy_tssi_based_pwr_ctrl_enabled(pi)) + wlc_lcnphy_tssi_setup(pi); } void wlc_phy_detach_lcnphy(struct brcms_phy *pi) @@ -4993,8 +5103,7 @@ bool wlc_phy_attach_lcnphy(struct brcms_phy *pi) if (!wlc_phy_txpwr_srom_read_lcnphy(pi)) return false; - if ((pi->sh->boardflags & BFL_FEM) && - (LCNREV_IS(pi->pubpi.phy_rev, 1))) { + if (LCNREV_IS(pi->pubpi.phy_rev, 1)) { if (pi_lcn->lcnphy_tempsense_option == 3) { pi->hwpwrctrl = true; pi->hwpwrctrl_capable = true; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.c index 622c01c..9fb0ca2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/phy/phytbl_lcn.c @@ -2058,6 +2058,73 @@ static const u16 dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_rev0[] = { 0x0005, }; +static const u16 dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_ipa_rev0_combo[] = { + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, + 0x0005, + 0x0006, + 0x0009, + 0x000a, +}; + static const u16 dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_rev0[] = { 0x0004, 0x0004, @@ -2834,6 +2901,12 @@ const struct phytbl_info dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313 = { sizeof(dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_rev0[0]), 15, 0, 16 }; +const struct phytbl_info dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_info_4313_bt_ipa = { + &dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_ipa_rev0_combo, + sizeof(dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_ipa_rev0_combo) / + sizeof(dot11lcn_sw_ctrl_tbl_4313_ipa_rev0_combo[0]), 15, 0, 16Not necessarily in this patch but maybe in a follow up cleanup patch: ARRAY_SIZE() please?
As I am reworking the patch, I will incorporate this comment as well.
I guess that's it from me.
Thanks again, Arend -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
