> > Mind you, I'm just writing whatever comes to my head ;) Better ideas > > welcome, especially since this makes tx_status_irqsafe() and tx_status() > > behave completely differently. > > I prefer to start to converge to something since iwlwifi driver is > broken for week on the tip of everything. Yeah let's fix that and then do the larger redesign later. > Incidentally, why does iwlwifi use both > > depending on in_interrupt(), or rather, why isn't the content statically > > known? > > Actually in spite of the IF there I don't think it ever happens that > iwlwifi uses tx_status() directly only irqsafe. Does any driver uses > tx_status directly anyway? ath5k does, but I have no idea why. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
