> > That's what I'm worried about - the implicit semantic change here. > > I think I understand your point now. > > I'm thinking of using series of passive scans for ACS now, so perhaps > the whole chan_time stuff is unnecessary. What are your thoughts about > it? Well, still then you're relying on the fact that passive channels scans will stick to each channel for ~110ms or so. This is true today, but it's not really specified. I don't think that using the scan command would be a big deal, but maybe this 'measurement' behaviour should be explicitly enabled? Maybe other devices even have to do something special to collect the data. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
