Search Linux Wireless

Re: So, which IEEE<->Frequency mappings should we be all using?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 10:42 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> * 420MHz
> * 700MHz
> * 900MHz (which we already have, due to history);
> * 3.6GHz
> * 4.9GHz

3.6 should have been defined in the spec recently, 4.9 surely is defined
already (though the whole stack will have to support the
dot11ChannelStartingFactor)

The others are kinda non-standard extensions, and you probably won't
even be able to properly support them since they're kinda
pretend-handled like 2.4 GHz.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux