Used NL80211_NUM_ACS to indicate the BCMC fifo used in the driver
which has the same value now, but it is a bad idea relying on that.
Signed-off-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
index 41f902d..e4fd13a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.c
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ static void brcmf_fws_dequeue_worker(struct work_struct *worker)
fws = container_of(worker, struct brcmf_fws_info, fws_dequeue_work);
brcmf_fws_lock(fws->drvr, flags);
- for (fifo = NL80211_NUM_ACS; fifo >= 0 && !fws->bus_flow_blocked;
+ for (fifo = BRCMF_FWS_FIFO_BCMC; fifo >= 0 && !fws->bus_flow_blocked;
fifo--) {
while ((fws->fifo_credit[fifo]) || ((!fws->bcmc_credit_check) &&
(fifo == BRCMF_FWS_FIFO_BCMC))) {
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
