> I'm finding it a bit cumbersome,. now when tx_rate is pointer and > doesn't resides in the ieee80211_tx_control > I've seen in your patch you've just ripped this code off but our rate > scale algorithms doesn't work without it actually the code that read > this value in rate scale algorithm is there but it actually looking > into empty space... > > - tx_status->control.tx_rate = > - iwl4965_hw_get_rate_n_flags(tx_resp->rate_n_flags); > > I'm just asking if you had something in mind or it's just something you forgot. TBH, that confused me completely since the rate scale algorithm tells the hardware what rate to use so why does the hw need to assign a different rate in the tx status? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
