On 25 June 2013 16:52, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I got following problem with the patch: > CC [M] drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.o > drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c: In function ‘bcma_pmu2_pll_init0’: > drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c:128:5: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow] > > This is caused by: > mask = ~(BCMA_RES_4314_HT_AVAIL | > BCMA_RES_4314_MACPHY_CLK_AVAIL); > > Any idea why > u32 mask = ~(BIT(28) | BIT(29)) > causes that? :| > > I could expect that in case of using BIT(31), but not 28/29... Are you perhaps compiling for a 64bit target? If so then I you're dealing with a 64bit bitmask here. Negating ends up as an overflow as you try to cram it into the 32bit var. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
