Search Linux Wireless

Re: nl80211 NULL pointer dereference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:06 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> nl80211_set_reg() is really careful about validating which netlink
> attributes the user has specified, and either not dereferencing or
> signalling an error when NULL is seen.
>
> Hmmm...

The code disassembles to

   0: 41 0f b6 46 04       movzbl 0x4(%r14),%eax
   5: 0f b6 fb             movzbl %bl,%edi
   8: 41 88 45 14           mov    %al,0x14(%r13)
   c: 41 0f b6 46 05       movzbl 0x5(%r14),%eax
  11: 41 88 45 15           mov    %al,0x15(%r13)
  15: e8 8c c5 fe ff       callq  0xfffffffffffec5a6
  1a: 84 c0                 test   %al,%al
  1c: 75 68                 jne    0x86
  1e: 49 8b 47 20           mov    0x20(%r15),%rax
  22: 4c 8b a0 10 01 00 00 mov    0x110(%rax),%r12
  29:* 45 0f b7 34 24       movzwl (%r12),%r14d <-- trapping instruction
  2e: 41 83 ee 04           sub    $0x4,%r14d
  32: 41 83 fe 03           cmp    $0x3,%r14d
  36: 7e 0e                 jle    0x46
  38: 41 0f b7 44 24 04     movzwl 0x4(%r12),%eax

(I deleted the two first bytes. they were part of an incomplete
preceding instruction). The "call/test/jne" seems to be this paert:

        /*
         * Disable DFS master mode if the DFS region was
         * not supported or known on this kernel.
         */
        if (reg_supported_dfs_region(dfs_region))
                rd->dfs_region = dfs_region;

and then the two moves into %rax an %r12 seem to be setting up for

        nla_for_each_nested(nl_reg_rule, info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_REG_RULES],

and then the movzwl (that traps) and the subsequent subtract seems to
be the inlined nla_len(nla), which is the "len" to the
nla_for_each_nested() -> nla_for_each_attr() macro expansion.

So it would seem that it's that

    info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_REG_RULES]

thing that is NULL.

And yes, the code checks that for being non-NULL in at the top of the
function, but maybe there is a race with something else setting it to
NULL? There is a kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) in between, so it doesn't even
have to be a very small race...

Hmm? I really don't know this code at all, so I'm just looking at the
source and lining up the oops...

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux