On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:49 +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > As I just saw an ath9k patch for rcu protection when ieee80211_get_tx_rates() is called. > > > Should this be done in carl9170 as well ? > > > > I think that patch is wrong actually, probably should just do the rcu > > protection inside the function. However the patch is completely wrong > > anyway (C isn't python) so ... > Uh, that's confusing. We are now talking about the patch from Thomas, right? > If so: the previous "new rate control api" feature patch for carl9170 should > be fine in this regard. No, Calvin Owens's patch. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html