On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 23:06 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> > > If allowed in a country, these channels typically require DFS > so mark them as such. Channel 144 is a bit special, it's coming > into use now to allow more VHT 80 channels, but world roaming > with passive scanning is acceptable anyway. It seems fairly > unlikely that it'll be used as the control channel for a VHT > AP, but it needs to be present to allow a full VHT connection > to an AP that uses it as one of the secondary channels. > > Also enable VHT 160 on these channels, and also for channels > 36-48 to be able to use VHT 160 there. You guys all get a few more days for comments, then I'm merging this next Monday. I really think it's the right thing to do, there's no reason to prohibit passive scanning on radar channels that I know of. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
