On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 15:56 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > I don't think I'd do either of those. Not creating P2P_DEVICE will > > simply not work with drivers expecting it, and changing iftype to/from > > P2P-Device isn't supported since it would delete/create the netdev. > > So should we check that in cfg80211 upon wiphy_register(). Check what? > > I don't really see much choice but reject (or ignore) this option for > > drivers using P2P_DEVICE. Why would anyone *really* want P2P operation > > on wlan0 when another interface can be used? > > In this mac80211_hwsim is a special case. We could make P2P_DEVICE > support in mac80211_hwsim optional using module parameter to allow > testing both cases. Yes, that we could do. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
