On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:26:48PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 14:20 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Jake, please test this set and check if it not cause association > > problems you reported earlier this month. > > > > Please apply it together with this mac80211 patch: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=136879090123023&w=2 > > which I already posted and is queued to upstream. Not having > > it may cause troubles and influence negatively this set test. > > > > Johannes, is need to check beacon bssid or even if rx frame > > is a beacon to unblock queues? I think if we receive any frame > > (not necessary beacon or our bssid beacon) on passive channel, > > that mean we can use that channel. But that depend how firmware > > is implemented, if firmware require our bssid beacon to unblock > > channel, driver of course need that too. > > I _think_ any frame with good CRC will do, but I'm not entirely sure for > 3945/4965. I prefer to unblock queues on any frame, as this allow to start operating quickly. Let's see if this will also work on Jake environment, I'll add patch 5/4 which implement that. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
