Yes, that is exactly the same patch that I used. It does it's job fixing my signal levels with one antenna. I was just wondering if there could be something else that is different with this revision, because the performance seems to be worse than with rt3070 on same environment. 2013/5/6 Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx>: > wireless newbie wrote: > >> Has anyone experience with Ralink RT5390 chip with revision 0503? I >> have that chip on my wireless usb module (WPER-172gn). I'm able to use >> only one antenna with it but it has very poor rx signal level that >> way. Adding second antenna for testing purposes clearly improves rx >> level but that is no option for me. >> >> I noticed in the list that someone had same sort of problem with >> rt5390 rev 1502. Problem was hardware antenna diversity that wasn't >> handled properly on the driver. Driver patch was provided to fix that. >> I applied those same changes for rev 0503 and that solved my rx level >> problem too. > > is it like this ? > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134136097328697 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
