On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 13:04 +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Here are some updates to our wireless firmwares. Updated the firmwares
> for WiLink 6 and 7 and added a new version of the firmware for WiLink 8
> and a binary configuration file. Also updated the WHENCE file
> accordingly.
>
> Please let me know if there are any more problems.
[...]
> diff --git a/WHENCE b/WHENCE
> index 4726742..257f24e 100644
> --- a/WHENCE
> +++ b/WHENCE
> @@ -1681,11 +1681,11 @@ Version: 6.5.2.0.15 (Multi-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-4-plt.bin
> Version: 6.3.5.0.98 (PLT-only)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-5-sr.bin
> -Version: 6.3.10.2.115 (Single-role)
> +Version: 6.3.10.0.133 (Single-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-5-mr.bin
> -Version: 6.5.7.0.27 (Multi-role)
> +Version: 6.5.7.0.42 (Multi-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-5-plt.bin
> -Version: 6.3.10.2.115 (PLT-only)
> +Version: 6.3.10.0.133 (PLT-only)
>
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw.bin
> Version: 7.1.5.50.74 (STA-only)
> @@ -1702,11 +1702,11 @@ Version: 7.5.2.0.15 (Multi-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-4-plt.bin
> Version: 7.3.5.0.98 (PLT)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-5-sr.bin
> -Version: 7.3.10.2.115 (Single-role)
> +Version: 7.3.10.0.133 (Single-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-5-mr.bin
> -Version: 7.5.7.0.27 (Multi-role)
> +Version: 7.5.7.0.42 (Multi-role)
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-5-plt.bin
> -Version: 7.3.10.2.115 (PLT-only)
> +Version: 7.3.10.2.133 (PLT-only)
>
> File: ti-connectivity/wl127x-nvs.bin
> File: ti-connectivity/wl128x-nvs.bin
[...]
The commit message for this bit says:
Update the wl127x and wl128x firmwares to *.3.10.0.133 for single-role
and *.5.7.0.42 for multi-role.
But for ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-5-sr.bin,
ti-connectivity/wl127x-fw-5-plt.bin and
ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-5-sr.bin this means the version is now *lower*
than before. For ti-connectivity/wl128x-fw-5-plt.bin the version is
incremented to end in 2.133, but this is contrary to the commit message.
Are some of these firmware images being downgraded? Should the version
numbers really end in 2.133 or 0.133?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If God had intended Man to program,
we'd have been born with serial I/O ports.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
