On Jan 28, 2008 5:10 PM, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:49:06AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008 8:38 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This patch creates new cfg80211 wiphy API for channel and bitrate > > > registration and converts mac80211 and drivers to the new API. The > > <snip> > > > > I do expect there to be bugs in this, especially wrt. transmit > > > power handling where I'm basically clueless about how it should work. > > > > True, total havoc > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes: > > > v1..v3: <untracked> > > > v4: fix bugs in iwl4965 > > > > Also inserting few, actually drawing it unusable. You are lucky we > > like you here :) > > The question is how we handle this?. Do you want to resubmit this > > huge patch or we fix it somehow over it... > > I think I'm going to hold this back from Dave for 2.6.25. It might > be better if we can fix any known problems with this patch before > re-merging it for pre-2.6.26 development. > So will you branch it publicly in wireless-2.6 or we do it on mailing list? I have some patches for iwl4965 to make HT compile again but after Pandora's box has opened so I stopped to try? I will send them out. What is the window left for 2.6.25? I'm just worried about cfg80211 general progress. Thanks Tomas > John > -- > John W. Linville > linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
