On 2013-04-28 9:19 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 28.04.2013 17:03, schrieb Oleksij Rempel: >> Am 28.04.2013 16:13, schrieb Oleksij Rempel: >>> Am 28.04.2013 14:51, schrieb Felix Fietkau: >>>> On 2013-04-27 5:25 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>>> Collect statistics about recived duplicate and STBC packets. >>>>> This information should help see if STBC is actually working. >>>>> >>>>> Tested on ar9285; >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> I thought about this patch some more, and I'm wondering what's the point >>>> in doing this? These statistics are going to be completely useless for >>>> most people and they'll waste some memory/cpu cycles, especially on >>>> small-cache devices. I think it's much more useful to simply pass the >>>> information to mac80211 via rx flags and get them added to the radiotap >>>> header. >>> >>> Sure. > > Now i need some help. > Why there is no traces of radiotap in ath9k. Some other drivers have > them? Do it communicate in some different way or there is just no > radiotap support in ath9k? radiotap is generated in mac80211, so there's no need for the driver to do it. - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
