On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:26 -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> The RCU docs used to state that rcu_barrier() included a wait
> for an RCU grace period; however the comments for rcu_barrier()
> as of commit f0a0e6f... "rcu: Clarify memory-ordering properties
> of grace-period primitives" contradict this.
>
> So add back synchronize_{rcu,net}() to where they once were,
> but keep the rcu_barrier()s for the call_rcu() callbacks.
Applied, thanks for spotting this!
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
