On 2013-04-17 5:46 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> @@ -454,40 +666,27 @@ void rate_control_get_rate(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> [...]
>> +int rate_control_set_rates(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
>> + struct ieee80211_sta *pubsta,
>> + struct ieee80211_sta_rates *rates)
>> +{
>> + struct ieee80211_sta_rates *old = rcu_dereference(pubsta->rates);
>> +
>> + rcu_assign_pointer(pubsta->rates, rates);
>> + if (old)
>> + kfree_rcu(old, rcu_head);
>
> This means the rate control module must allocate a different
> ieee80211_sta_rates right ?
Right.
- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
