On 2013-04-17 5:23 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> @@ -692,16 +692,38 @@ ieee80211_tx_h_rate_ctrl(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx)
>> */
>> rate_control_get_rate(tx->sdata, tx->sta, &txrc);
>>
>> - if (unlikely(info->control.rates[0].idx < 0))
>> - return TX_DROP;
>> + if (tx->sta)
>> + ratetbl = rcu_dereference(tx->sta->sta.rates);
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(info->control.rates[0].idx < 0)) {
>> + if (ratetbl) {
>> + struct ieee80211_tx_rate rate = {
>> + .idx = ratetbl->rate[0].idx,
>> + .flags = ratetbl->rate[0].flags,
>> + .count = ratetbl->rate[0].count
>> + };
>> +
>> + if (ratetbl->rate[0].idx < 0)
>> + return TX_DROP;
>> +
>> + tx->rate = rate;
> tx->rate = ratetbl->rate[0];
No, the data structure in ratetbl->rate is not compatible.
- Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
