On 2013-04-15 3:44 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 00:03 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote: > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rate_control_set_rates); > > I don't think that needs to be exported (at least not now)? Just thought I'd let driver-implemented rate control modules access it as well if they want to. > I suspect that the answer to my question in patch 2 lies here, if the > rate control updates the table then would it not just update the table > when the protection mechanism needs to be changed? There should be > triggers for that, rather than having to check the "use_cts" variables > on every packet, and if they aren't complete that should be fixed? I guess we could do some further work on that, but for now I wanted to keep things simple by having only the rate control module touch the table (and not have it care about CTS protection). - Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
