On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 13:49 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >> I am a dark-ages guy :-p I think I will rename the BOOTP one and > >> indicate it should be used for BOOTP and DHCPv6. > > > > Might also be worth it to rename ARP to APIPA since ARP is ... well > > often done :-) > > I chose ARP because APIPA is essentially not a protocol. As far as I > understand it makes use of ARP to make sure the address in unique. I see > your point and will change it. Then again it all may go away :-) I see your point too, but I'd argue that APIPA is really more of a higher-level protocol that uses ARP for its implementation? > > Well you have to store the nlportid (rather than crit_proto_started) and > > then check it. > > Yeah, I surmised that already. If I would drop crit_proto_started and > use the portid as a flag as well, I need an invalid portid. Is there a > definition for that? I'm pretty sure 0 is invalid for userspace because it means "kernel". johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
