On 04/09/2013 02:50 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 09:00 -0700, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The sta_info hash is designed to deal with an AP
with lots of stations associated, or a station interface
connected to a single AP.
Given your other hash patches, does this even make sense still?
This handles the TX side for station VIFs. The more complicated
hashing handles the rx logic. I could use the hash
for the tx side, though performance is likely a small bit
worse since you have to deal with the hash logic.
And, if the more complicated RFC hashing patch has no upstream
chance anyway, then if the 'some-sta' patch is acceptable,
I'd still be interested in seeing it upstream.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
