On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 10:11 +0100, Vincent wrote: >>> Fix one code path where chanctx_conf is tested as being non-NULL while it may >>> be uninitialized. >> >> No, you're wrong, presumably misled by the compiler. >> > > Hi, > > especially, when you use gcc >=4.7.x compiler with "-Os" > optimize-level you and your binaries/libs get confused. > Arnd Bergmann sent a patch for these "false-positives" (use > "-Wmaybe-uninitialized" as a CFLAGS). > I think this is a good idea. > If more kernel-developers ACK it, it might get mainline :-)? > Gogogo johill (but don't runaway) :-)... > > For more details see also gcc-docs on how to suppress errors and treat > them as warnings [1]. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options > Uuurgh, forgot to add the link for Arnd's patch.... - Sedat - [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2274041/ >> johannes >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
