On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 20:54 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote:
> > No, older wpa_supplicant/hostapd still use monitor interfaces for
> > management frame transmissions, and require rate control.
> >
>
> Since they require rate control, I guess they don't pass any radiotap
> IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_{RATE,MCS} ? In that case that wouldn't disturb them.
Yeah, indeed, I wasn't looking right ...
> And, oops typo, I meant :
>
> + !(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_INJECTED && info->control.rates[0] != -1))
>
> with info->control.rates[0] properly set in the radiotap header parsing,
> instead of :
>
> > > + !(info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_INJECTED && info->control.rates[i]))
>
> If that changes anything to what you guessed.
Well actually this won't work anyway because control.rates[] isn't
initialized to -1.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
