On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 10:41 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:51:08AM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > > When MCS rates start to get bad in 2.4 GHz because of long range or > > strong interference, CCK rates can be a lot more robust. > > > > This patch adds a pseudo MCS group containing CCK rates (long preamble > > in the lower 4 slots, short preamble in the upper slots). > > > With this, mac80211 might send CCK rates with IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU set. > For aggregates, if we don't currently set NO_CCK, at the very least the > 1st rate index should belong to an MCS_GROUP. I guess that depends on how you expect rate control to work ... I'd kinda expect the driver to skip aggregation then? I think only ath9k even uses minstrel + aggregation? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
