On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 02/21/2013 01:17 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > > I've been poking around in b43 and brcmsmac trying to wrap my head > > around device detection. Obviously, b43 and brcmsmac both support > > some devices, and since 4f3d09d (b43: add option to avoid > > duplicating device support with brcmsmac, 2012-01-11) overlapping > > devices have been masked behind CONFIG_B43_BCMA_EXTRA. At the time > > of that commit, brcmsmac didn't support the r17 cores, but support > > has since been added in 6f80f01 (brcmsmac: add support for cores > > with revision 17, 2012-12-07). Does that mean that b43 should move > > the r17 core entry into the masked-by-CONFIG_B43_BCMA_EXTRA block? > > Yes you could move that core id into the CONFIG_B43_BCMA_EXTRA block, > but this core was just found on Router SoCs and there you mostly want > to use AP mode, which brcmsmac does not support. So maybe a CONFIG_BRCM_BCMA_EXTRA to mask brcmsmac devices when b43 is the recommended module? -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
