On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:43:26 -0800, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > I did not like this approach because the sta_info struct is so big that
> > when we want to fill the stats substruct only we will waste a lot of bytes.
>
> I don't understand your point.
>
> struct sta_info {
> ...
> struct stats stats;
> };
My concern is about those "..." that we are allocating within the sta_info struct
that we will never use for every non-peer station.
While if we used the struct below (with its own hash table), we would allocate
only the space needed for the stats.
>
> struct stats_entry {
> struct hash/list/whatever;
> struct stats stats;
> };
>
no?
Maybe I misunderstood your idea?
Cheers,
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
Attachment:
pgp3XVKFlpIiD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
