On Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:22 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Declaring > > inline int iwl3945_eeprom_acquire_semaphore(...) > > is a bit weird for a function that is actually declared in a header > file and not static. This is not merge fallout, but has been this way since the driver was merged the first time. I do not know why it was done this way and I am not familiar enough with gcc optimization to know the implications of this (or what the better way should be). What do you suggest? Thanks Reinette - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
