On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:20:48PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 17:47 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
> > +static inline bool ieee80211_is_ps_disabled(struct ieee80211_conf *conf)
>
> > +static inline bool ieee80211_is_ps_enabled(struct ieee80211_conf *conf)
>
> Huh, is that worth the confusion? It seems !enabled should be the same
> as disabled, but it's not quite the same, which might be confusing.
In this patch there's no distinction, but after adding the off-channel
powersave state there is -- disabled == !enabled && !offchannel.
Actually one of the last bugs I fixed before sending these was a place
where I had used disabled instead of !enabled, and the frames ended up
with PM set when it shouldn't have been.
I agree though that the distinction is confusing. Maybe some better
state names are needed. Perhaps awake, offchannel, and doze?
> > +/**
> > + * ieee80211_set_ps_state - set device powersave state
> > + *
> > + * Sets the powersave state in the supplied device configuration to the
> > + * specified state.
> > + *
> > + * @conf: device configuration
> > + * @state: new powersave state. Must be one of the IEEE80211_CONF_PS_*
> > + * flags from enum ieee80211_conf_flags.
> > + */
> > +static inline void ieee80211_set_ps_state(struct ieee80211_conf *conf,
> > + u32 state)
> > +{
> > + conf->flags = (conf->flags & ~IEEE80211_CONF_PS_MASK) |
> > + (state & IEEE80211_CONF_PS_MASK);
> > +}
>
> I don't think the driver should do this, so the inline shouldn't be
> here?
That's true. Would moving it to ieee80211_i.h be appropriate, or is
there somewhere better?
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
