On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:25:04PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:01:02 +0100 > Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:55:58PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > Except latency, patch perhaps also improve throughput, since we > > > spend more time on-channel while scanning. But I'm not quite sure, > > > since overall scanning time is bigger. I did not test influence of > > > the patch on throughput. > > > > > > I tested patch by doing: > > > > > > while true; do iw dev wlan0 scan; sleep 3; done > /dev/null > > > > I can see slight throughput improvement with patch, measured by scp: > > > > Upload to periodical scanning machine: > > scp -B Fedora-18-Beta-i686-Live-Desktop.iso stasiu@192.168.1.105:~/ > > > > Unpatched: 3.9MB/s 03:15 > > Patched: 4.3MB/s 02:58 > > W/o any scan? > > > Download from periodical scanning machine: > > scp -B stasiu@192.168.1.105:~/Fedora-18-Beta-i686-Live-Desktop.iso . > > > > Unpatched: 5.5MB/s 02:17 > > Patched: 6.2MB/s 02:02 > > W/o any scan? On target machine I performed periodical scan every 3 second i.e. run command: "while true; do iw dev wlan0 scan; sleep 3; done" . Source machine was connected to AP by wire. Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
