On Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:05:20 AM Johan Danielsson wrote: > > [...] I argued that if we have no (or no longer) a BA agreement > > [even if the peer never got the DELBA] we can discard the AMPDU data > > and sent a DELBAs to the HT peer once it tries sent us an A-MPDU > > (again). This is actually what we should do according to 802.11-2012 > > 10.5.4 - instead of calling dont_reorder. > > I think this is a reasonable interpretation, even though 10.5.4 > doesn't explicitly cover this case (since the Ack Policy is set to > Normal Ack). This is were RX_FLAG_AMPDU_DETAILS would come into the game. If this rx flag is set we know that the frame was part of an AMPDU and not a normal non-aggregated QoS-Data frame. Regards, Chr -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
