On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:44:14AM CET, sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:23:07AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> >-static const struct ethtool_ops default_ethtool_ops;
> >> >+const struct ethtool_ops default_ethtool_ops;
> >> >+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(default_ethtool_ops);
> >>
> >> I think that default_ethtool_ops should stay static. Wouldn't it be
> >> nicer to introduce a helper like:
> >>
> >> bool dev_has_default_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *dev)
> >> {
> >> return dev->ethtool_ops == &default_ethtool_ops;
> >> }
> >
> >Then I still have to export this function. So with your approch, number
> >of exported symbols will be the same, but there will be few more lines
> >of code.
>
> I think it's always better to add few more lines in order to prevent possible
> confusion which exporting default_ethtool_ops might introduce...
What possible confusion it might cause?
Stanislaw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
