On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 03:43:46PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:14 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote: > > Presumably, once someone implements beacon collision avoidance, > > I'd rather have the current dtim/beacon_int values, which isn't > > really setup anymore, but maybe we don't care so much. > > Seems fine, but I think you should document the latter. OTOH, maybe it > should just be documented that the setup values are hints only when that > is implemented ... I plan to look at MBCA soon, so I'll think on it a bit. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html