On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:36:58PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 14:58 +0100, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > > > * @chandef: the channel definition > > + * @dfs_capab: supported DFS bandwidth > > * > > * This function returns true if there is no secondary channel or the secondary > > * channel(s) can be used for beaconing (i.e. is not a radar channel etc.) > > */ > > bool cfg80211_reg_can_beacon(struct wiphy *wiphy, > > - struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef); > > + struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef, > > + enum nl80211_chan_width dfs_capab); > > Hm how does that make sense? The chandef contains a width? It seems like > the check whether or not DFS is supported (should be a bitfield btw) > should be outside of this function? I'll change the DFS support capabilities to a bitfield and drop this patch. The bitfield can be part of wiphy, and thus doesn't need to be passed down, making this patch obsolete. Cheers, Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
