On 12/27/2012 02:05 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 13:42 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:With 3.8-rc1, the first call of pci_map_single() that is not checked with a corresponding pci_dma_mapping_error() call results in a warning with a splat as follows: WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:933 check_unmap+0x480/0x950() Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv2700 Notebook PC forcedeth 0000:00:0a.0: DMA-API: device driver failed to check map error[device address=0x00000000b176e002] [size=90 bytes] [mapped as single] Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c index 653487d..de39cf2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c @@ -1821,6 +1821,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev) skb->data, skb_tailroom(skb), PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev, + np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) { + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);skb has no destructor yet, kfree_skb(skb) should be fine
OK.
+ goto packet_dropped; + } np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb); np->put_rx.orig->buf = cpu_to_le32(np->put_rx_ctx->dma); wmb(); @@ -1830,6 +1835,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx(struct net_device *dev) if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx)) np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx; } else { +packet_dropped: u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp); np->stat_rx_dropped++; u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp); @@ -1856,6 +1862,11 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev) skb->data, skb_tailroom(skb), PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE); + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev, + np->put_rx_ctx->dma)) { + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); + goto packet_dropped; + } np->put_rx_ctx->dma_len = skb_tailroom(skb); np->put_rx.ex->bufhigh = cpu_to_le32(dma_high(np->put_rx_ctx->dma)); np->put_rx.ex->buflow = cpu_to_le32(dma_low(np->put_rx_ctx->dma)); @@ -1866,6 +1877,7 @@ static int nv_alloc_rx_optimized(struct net_device *dev) if (unlikely(np->put_rx_ctx++ == np->last_rx_ctx)) np->put_rx_ctx = np->first_rx_ctx; } else { +packet_dropped: u64_stats_update_begin(&np->swstats_rx_syncp); np->stat_rx_dropped++; u64_stats_update_end(&np->swstats_rx_syncp); @@ -2217,6 +2229,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t nv_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) bcnt = (size > NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE) ? NV_TX2_TSO_MAX_SIZE : size; np->put_tx_ctx->dma = pci_map_single(np->pci_dev, skb->data + offset, bcnt, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE); + if (pci_dma_mapping_error(np->pci_dev, + np->put_tx_ctx->dma)) + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;Really this is not going to work very well : caller will call this in a loop.
Any suggestions on what value should be returned, or does the caller need to be modified?
Thanks for the review, Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
