On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:58:31AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Gabor Juhos <juhosg@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Since we use completion here, why we can not just use normal synchronous > >> version of request_firmware? I heard of request_firmware drawbacks, so > >> this approach can be correct. Just want to know if we do not complicate > >> things not necessarily here. > > > > If the driver is built into the kernel, then the synchronous version > > would fail because user-space is not up during probe time. > > Didn't udev/systemd guys finally fix their software? At least I recall > seeing such claims on g+. Udev broke and later fixed request_firmware when driver is compiled as module. Here we avoid problem when driver is compiled into kernel (problem which was there from very beginning) - no userspace available so request_firmware fail. But since everyone are using modules, nobody cares. Openwrt must use modules too, since it use compat-wireless, right? So I'm not sure if it worth to use request_firmware_nowait. Especially like that with completion, which block ->probe. As long kernel does not probes devices in parallel, we block whole boot, and deadlock since probe wait for userspace. Gabor, did you test your patches ? Stanislaw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html