On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 10:01 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:58:05PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Ok. Yes, we will of course adhere to that, but I was wondering whether > > maybe the net stack assumes somewhere that a packet it got from the > > driver can be written to w/o copying. > > All parts of the rx stack support clone handling because they can always > run after another handler (e.g., AF_PACKET) which may have cloned the > packet. Great, thanks for confirming, we'll do that then. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
