On 12/06/2012 04:25 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
Won't this break drivers which for some reason have their own
ethtool_ops?
I guess it will. What a mess.
Maybe we could assign individual method pointers in the ethtool_ops
struct if it already exists (and if those pointers are NULL)?
We should probably assing ethtool_ops before wireless core will
call alloc_netdev.
Stanislaw
I don't have time to work on this today...maybe not tomorrow either.
So, if someone else feels like fixing it, please feel free.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
