On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 14:19 +0200, Eyal Shapira wrote: > On 5 December 2012 13:21, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > IMO it would have been nicer to keep the existing ones as they are and > > not change the semantics. Then add the new ones with another name. > > Maybe something like "max_dwell_time_active_long", which is more > > generic. > > > > It is possible that we will find more scenarios where this long scans > > could be used (eg. if it would be possible to identify whether there are > > any low latency TIDs running or not). > > > > Sure. I'll respin it. Thanks a lot, dude! :) -- Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
