> > @@ -1212,7 +1212,8 @@ void ieee80211_sta_stop_rx_BA_session(struct net_device *dev, u8 *ra, u16 tid,
> > struct ieee80211_local *local = wdev_priv(dev->ieee80211_ptr);
> > struct ieee80211_hw *hw = &local->hw;
> > struct sta_info *sta;
> > - int ret;
> > + struct ieee80211_rx_status status;
> > + int ret, i;
> >
> > sta = sta_info_get(local, ra);
> > if (!sta)
> > @@ -1254,6 +1255,20 @@ void ieee80211_sta_stop_rx_BA_session(struct net_device *dev, u8 *ra, u16 tid,
> > ieee80211_send_delba(dev, ra, tid, 0, reason);
> >
> > /* free the reordering buffer */
> > + for (i = 0; i < sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx[tid].buf_size; i++) {
>
> Something I just thought of but probably simply missed: where's the
> session torn down when we ifdown an interface while an A-MPDU session is
> active? I didn't go through all the patches again, did I miss that
> somewhere?
>
No, and it should be done.
were would you recommend to put this tear down? i need a flow were i
can be sta specific, and is called only once per ifdown.
sta_info_release related flow, were i thought to put it, is risking me
with endless loops of kref_put calls.
> johannes
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
