> EIP at delay_tsc+0x22/0x50 > [couldn't read the EBX and such, but I guess you won't care] It'd be good to know actually, along with disassembly. > So I guessed that locking was lacking somewhere. The following patch fixes > the issue for me, but I'm not sure at all that it's the right fix. Thanks. Definitely not. If you look at the code in question, it has nothing at all that needs locking. It's not accessing any shared structures at all. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
