On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:09:35 +0100 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Below is the patch, comments welcome. I think this is the way we want > it, tristate for all rate control algorithms regardless of whether > mac80211 is modular (where =y then means "build algorithm into > mac80211") and forcing one of the algorithms to y to do exactly that. What about avoiding to force any algorithm to y, and instead always build a dummy (a few lines of code which would just set the rate to the lowest available) rate control algorithm into mac80211? Looks good otherwise. -- Ciao Stefano - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
