On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > >> Perhaps because it is used? > >> > >> > --- everything.orig/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c 2007-12-21 01:02:11.253160428 +0100 > >> > +++ everything/net/mac80211/ieee80211_sta.c 2007-12-21 01:02:32.113165907 +0100 > >> > @@ -458,12 +458,10 @@ static void ieee80211_set_associated(str > >> > return; > >> > > >> > if (assoc) { > >> > - struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata; > > > > Too little context. There's another one in the surrounding scope that is > > already initialised exactly the same. > > Sorry, but I can't find it. Was it added in an unmerged patch? I think I'm with Andreas here...? -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html